Différences entre les versions de « Aurélien Barrau »

6 octets supprimés ,  11 janvier 2020 à 08:02
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
[[w:Aurélien Barrau]]
[[w:Aurélien Barrau]]


== 2020 ==
==2020==
[[Fichier:Cover.jpg|vignette]]
[[Fichier:Cover.jpg|vignette]]


=== Début du chapitre ''"Que se passe-t-il maintenant ?"'' ===
===Début du chapitre ''"Que se passe-t-il maintenant ?"''===
Extrait du livre "Le plus grand defi de l'histoire de l'humanité - Édition revue et augmentée", publié le 9 janvier 2020 :
Extrait du livre "Le plus grand defi de l'histoire de l'humanité - Édition revue et augmentée", publié le 9 janvier 2020 :
<br />
<br />
Ligne 26 : Ligne 26 :
On the other hand, the Citizens' Convention has been convened. It follows a logic that is almost the opposite, clinging to political action. But political action that is literally citizen-oriented, without censorship, without electoral or careerist pressure. An attempt at direct democracy. Are there risks of instrumentalization or pretextualization? Obviously yes. However, if it is very supported, very discussed, very scrutinised, this assembly, drawn by lot and supervised with benevolence and rigour by Cyril Dion, could lead to very surprising results.
On the other hand, the Citizens' Convention has been convened. It follows a logic that is almost the opposite, clinging to political action. But political action that is literally citizen-oriented, without censorship, without electoral or careerist pressure. An attempt at direct democracy. Are there risks of instrumentalization or pretextualization? Obviously yes. However, if it is very supported, very discussed, very scrutinised, this assembly, drawn by lot and supervised with benevolence and rigour by Cyril Dion, could lead to very surprising results.


It is easy to see the limits, risks, vacuums or potential dangers of these two approaches - which are not necessarily antagonistic to each other. It would be simple to list their weaknesses and contradictions in countless articles, which are bound to flourish. But perhaps, for once, we could use our energy to unite and ally ourselves in the face of the "greatest challenge in the history of mankind"? What if, for once, we tried to believe in it? To rediscover a form of ingenuity and to do so. To make life. Confucius wrote: "When you do something, know that you will have against you those who would do the same thing, those who would do the opposite, and the vast majority of those who would do nothing. "You have to get out of that.
It is easy to see the limits, risks, vacuums or potential dangers of these two approaches - which are not necessarily antagonistic to each other. It would be simple to list their weaknesses and contradictions in countless articles, which are bound to flourish. But perhaps, for once, we could use our energy to unite and ally ourselves in the face of the "greatest challenge in the history of mankind"? What if, for once, we tried to believe in it? To rediscover a form of ingenuity and to do so. To make life. Confucius wrote: "When you do something, know that you will have against you those who would do the same thing, those who would do the opposite, and the vast majority of those who would do nothing." We have to get out of that.
|}
|}


5 380

modifications